货币与经济周期后凯恩斯主义与奥地利学派比较

    【英文标题】Currency and Economic Circle: A Comparison between Post Keynesian School and Austrian School
    【作者简介】谢志刚，中国社会科学院经济研究所，北京市西城区月坛北小街2号中国社会科学院经济研究所当代西方经济理论研究室，xiezg@cass.org.cn100836
    【内容提要】当前金融危机引发了对主流经济思想的反思，部分非主流的经济思想得以获得重视。本文比较了后凯恩斯学派与奥地利学派的货币与经济周期理论的主要框架以及相关思想，认为将不确定性与时间、预期等概念置于经济分析的核心位置是后凯恩斯与奥地利学派共同的特点，并且由此构成了对主流理论和方法批判的基础。另一方面，两者在基础认识上仍存在着重大差异。这种差异突出地表现在方法论个人主义与总量分析方法的对立以及对企业家、市场过程等方面的不同理解，并导致截然相反的经济政策导向。
    Discredit on mainstream economics and interesting of Post Keynesian School and Austrian School increases because of the financial crisis nowadays. Based on the study of uncertainty, historical time and expectation, Post Keynesian and Austrian economists both build their monetary models of business cycle, and criticize the static equilibrium analyze method of mainstream economics. However, difference in the foundational methodology of the two economic schools result in diversity of entrepreneur and market process theories, and furthermore, the contrary opinions about the roles of governments in economy.
    【关 键 词】经济周期/后凯恩斯学派/奥地利学派business cycle/Post Keynesian economics/Austrian economics

     货币与经济周期.pdf