Abstract:According to “Pollution Haven Effect”, in order to circumvent stringency environmental standards, dirty industries in developed countries will be chosen to locate into developing countries; another way is that developed countries increase imports of dirty products instead of producing by their own, both of which can contribute to the changes of comparative advantages in the past 30years. Since 1990s, many scholars have paid special attention on whether environmental regulations affect the trade patterns or not, but the conclusions are ambiguous. This paper, based on the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek (HOV) model and using respectively 95 and 42 countries sample data in year of 2005, is an empirical analysis which shows that: (1) according to the estimated results based on the “environmental governance” index calculated by CIESIN, environmental regulations do not change the comparative advantages of five types of pollution-intensive goods; (2) On the other hand, when the per capita income is considered as an endogenous indicator of environmental regulation, environmental regulation will significantly promote the comparative advantages in chemical products, iron and steel products and paper products, though environmental regulations do not take any influence on non-metallic minerals products and non-ferrous metals products. I believe that appropriate level of environmental regulation can promote a comparative advantage in pollution-intensive goods.
Keywords:environmental regulation, pollution-intensive products, comparative advantages, trade patterns
View Online ( Frontiers of Economics in China,2010.Issue 2 )