技术型服务业高获利能力：市场势力还是创新红利兼论结构性减税和协同创新对技术型服务业创新的作用

        Technology-intensive Services＇ High Profitability： Market Forces or Innovative Bonus--With Additional Study on the Role of Structural Tax Cuts and Collaborative Innovation on Technology-based Service Industries＇ Innovation
    基金：基金项目：湖南省优秀社科研究基地专项资助项目“基于后发优势演变的湖南省生产性服务业就业吸纳效率改进措施研究”（12JDZ11）.
    摘要：服务行业相对制造行业具有更高的平均获利能力。本文首先构建了一个两阶段成本节约型创新博弈模型，得出技术型服务企业高获利能力主要来自于企业的研发创新，而不是其市场势力的理论假说。通过运用60家技术型服务上市公司截面数据的实证检验，发现研发创新与技术型服务上市公司的高获利能力有显著的正相关关系，而市场势力与技术型服务上市公司的高获利能力有显著的负相关关系，服务企业还没有形成普遍的市场势力，企业在位时长、企业规模并不是服务企业市场势力的主要决定性因素。因此，技术型服务企业应该走创新发展战略，不要盲目追求市场垄断势力。
    Service industries have higher average profitability than that of manufacturing sectors. This paper firstly builds a two-stage game model of cost-saving innovations and makes the theory hypothesis that the technical service industries＇ high profitability mainly comes from the R~-D of corporations, rather than their market power. The empirical test results show that there is a significant positive correlation between RInD and high profitability, but a significant negative correlation between market forces and high profitability by using the cross-sectional data of 60 technology-oriented service Listed companies. Service companies have not formed universal market forces. Firm size and life are not the primary determining factors of market power. So, the technology-oriented enterprises should pursue the innovation developmental strategy, not the market power blindly.
    关 键 词：技术密集型服务业 获利能力 市场势力 创新红利
    Technology-intensive Services, Profitability, Market Forces, Innovation Bonus
    分 类 号：F062.4
    参考文献：[1]曾世宏,郑江淮.二元就业结构,劳动力流动与中国服务业发展[J].湖南科技大学学报(哲社版),2012,(4).
    [2][英]马丁·斯蒂芬森.《高级产业经济学》,史东辉等译,上海财经大学出版社2003年版.
    [3]马晓河.《服务业与经济增长》,经济科学出版社2011年版.
    [4]黄枫,吴纯杰.《市场势力测度与影响因素分析-基于我国化学药品制造业研究》,《经济学(季刊)》2013年第4期.
    [5]Baumol, W. J., Entrepreneurship. Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 11 No. 1 ,January 1996,pp. 3-20.
    [6]d'Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin,Cooperative and Non-Cooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review,Vol. 78,No. 5,May 1988,pp. 1133-1139.
    [7]Demsetz,H. ,Industry Structure,Market Rivalry,and Public Policy. Journal of Law & Economics. ,Vol. 16,No. 1,April 1973,pp. 1-9.
    [8]Devece,C. A. ,D. Palacios and R. Fernandez, Entrepreneurship Research in Service Industries. a Literature Classification and Trend Analysis. InternationalManagement Journal,Vol. 21 ,No. 7,July 2011,pp. 497-493.
    [9]Hazlett T. W. and D. L. Weisman, Market Power in US Broadband Services. Review of Industry Organization, Vol. 38, No. 2,Feb 2011,pp. 151-171.
    [10]Kumar, A.S., SME Entrepreneurship, Firm Performance, and Corporate Governance Practices in Indian Service Firms. Journal of Serwices Research ,Vol. 7 ,No. 2 ,February 2008 ,pp. 99- 114.
    [11]Lee,R. P. and R. Grewal, Strategic Response to New Technologies and Their Impact on Firm Performance. Journal of Marketing ,Vol. 68,No. 4,April 2004,pp. 157-172.
    [12]Schumpeter,J. A. Development. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 43 No. 1, March 2005, pp. 108- 120.

     技术型服务业高获利能力：市场势力还是创新红利.pdf