List of Literature

    1.        McKeown, Thomas and R.G. Record. 1962. “Reasons for the decline of mortality in England and Wales during the nineteenth century,” Population Studies 16(2): 94-122.
    2.        Blake, Judith. 1968. “Are babies consumer durables? A critique of the economic theory of reproductive motivation,” Population Studies 22: 5‑25.
    3.        Coale, 1971. “Age patterns of marriage,” Population Studies, 25: 193-214.
    4.        Keyfitz, Nathan. 1973. “Individual Mobility in a Stationary Population,” Population Studies 27: 335-52.
    5.        Gamrah, H. A. 1976. “Methods of adjusting the stable estimates of fertility for the effects of mortality decline”. Population Studies 30: 165-177.
    6.        Page, 1976. “Patterns underlying fertility schedules: a decomposition by both age and marriage duration,” Population Studies 30: 85-106.
    7.        Page and Wunsch, 1976. “Parental survival data: more results of the application of Ledermann’s Model Life Table,” Population Studies 30: 59-76.
    8.        Hill and Trussell, 1977. “Further developments in mortality estimation,” Population Studies 31: 313-334.
    9.        Dixon, Ruth B. 1978. “Late marriage and non‑marrying as demographic responses: are they similar?” Population Studies 32: 449‑466.
    10.    Preston, Samuel H. and Etienne van de Walle. 1978. “Urban French mortality in the nineteenth century.” Population Studies 32(2): 275-297.
    11.    Zaba. 1979. “The four parameter logit life table system,” Population Studies 33: 79-100.
    12.    Martin, L. G. 1980. “A modification for use in destabilized populations of Brass’ technique for estimating completeness of death registration,” Population Studies 34: 381-395
    13.    Palloni, A. 1980. “Estimating infant and childhood mortality under conditions of changing mortality.” Population Studies 34:129-142.
    14.    Ewbank et al., 1983. “A reducible four parameter system of model life tables,” Population Studies 37:105-127.
    15.    Gray, A. 1986, “Sectional growth balance analysis for non-stable closed populations.” Population Studies 40: 425-436.
    16.    Cleland, John and Christopher Wilson. 1987. “Demand theories of the fertility transition: An iconoclastic view.” Population Studies 41:5-30.
    17.    Rodriguez and Cleland, 1988. “Modeling marital fertility by age and duration: an empirical appraisal of the Page model,” Population Studies 42:241-258.
    18.    Feeney, Griffith and Yuan Jianhua. 1994. “Below replacement fertility in China? A close look at recent evidence.” Population Studies 48(3):381‑394.
    19.    Kirk Dudley. 1996. “Demographic Transition Theory”. Population Studies 50: 360-387.
    20.    Frankenberg, Elizabeth, Angelique Chan, and Mary Beth Ofstedal. 2002. “Stability and change in living arrangements in Indonesia, Singapore, and Taiwan, 1993-99.”  Population Studies 56:201-213.
    21.    Bongaarts John. 2003. “Completing the fertility transition in the developing world: The role of educational differences and fertility preferences.” Population Studies 57: 321- 336
    22.    Caldwell John and Thomas Schindlmayr. 2003. “Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: a search for commonalities.” Population Studies 57: 241-263.
    23.    Billari Francesco and Hans-Peter Kohler. 2004. “Patterns of the low and lowest-low fertility in Europe.” Population Studies 58: 161-176.
    24.  Van Bavel, Jan. 2004. “Deliberate birth spacing before the fertility transition in Europe: evidence from nineteenth-century Belgium.” Population Studies 58(1): 95-107.