技术创新政策研究框架

    【参考文献】
    [1]Tether, B.. The role of design in business performance. In: ESRC center for research on innovation and competition(CRIC), University of Manchester, 2005.
    [2]Woodham, J. M.. Formulating national design policies in the United States: Recycling the emperor's new clothes. Design Issues, 2010, 26(2): 2, 7-46.
    [3]Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., Laranja, M.. Re-conceptualising the policy mix for innovation. Research Policy, 2011, 40(5): 702-713.
    [4]McGowan, F., Rado, V. S., Evi, C. S., Von Tunzelmann, G. N.. The emerging industrial structure of the wider Europe. Routledge, 2004.
    [5]Edquist, C., Hommen, L.. Systems of innovation: Theory and policy for the demand side. Technology Society, 1999, 21: 63-79.
    [6]Shyu, J. Z., Chiu, Y., Yuo, C.. Across-national comparative analysis of innovation policy in the integrated circuit industry. Technology Society, 2001, 23: 227-240.
    [7]Tinbergen, J.. On the theory of economic policy. Amsterdam: N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij, 1952.
    [8]Foxon, T., Pearson, P., Makuch, Z., Mata, M.. Policy drivers and barriers for sustainable innovation. London: ICEPT Monograph. Imperial College, 2005.
    [9]Nill, J., Kemp, R.. Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm. Research Policy, 2009, 38: 668-680.
    [10]Lundvall, Bengt-Ake. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992.
    [11]Mohnen, P., Rller, L.. Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review, 2005, 49(6): 1431-1450.
    [12]Smith, K.. Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: Rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise & Innovation Management Studies, 2000, 1(1): 73-102.
    [13]Voss, J. P., Newig, J., Kastens, B., Monstadt, J., Nlting, B.. Steering for sustainable development: A typology of problems and strategies with respect to ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2007, 9: 193-212.
    [14]UNU-MERIT, Technopolis group, Manchester institute of innovation research, wise guys limited, Joanneum research, ZEW policy mixes for R&D in Europe, final report of the project "monitoring and analysis of policies and public financing instruments conducive to higher levels of R&D investments". Contract No. DG-RTD-2005-M-01-02, 2009.
    [15]Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S.. In search of useful public policies: Key lessons and issues for policy maker. In: Carlsson, B.,(Ed.), Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, 1997.
    [16]Edquist, C., Hommen, L., Johnson, B., et al.. The ISE policy statement—The innovation policy implications of the "innovations systems and European integration". Research Project Funded by the TSER Programme(DG XII). Linkping University, Linkoping, 1998.
    [17]Johnson, B., Gregersen, B.. System of innovation and economic integration. Journal of Industry Studies, 1994, 2: 1-18.
    [18]North, D. C.. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1991.
    [19]Smith, K.. Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: Rethinking the role of policy. In: Bryant, K., Wells, A.(Eds.), A new economic paradigm? Innovation-based evolutionary systems, commonwealth of Australia, department of industry, science and resources, science and technology policy branch, Canberra, 1999.
    [20]Malerba Franco. Innovation and the dynamics and evolution of industries: Progress and challenges. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2007, 25(4): 675-699.
    [21]Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M., Gilsing, V.. A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 2005, 25: 609-619.
    [22]Barbosa, N., Faria, A. P.. Innovation across Europe: How important are institutional differences? Research Policy, 2011, 40(9): 1157-1169.
    [23]Porter, M.. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press, 1990.
    [24]Ohmae, K.. The end of the nation state: The rise of regional economics. New York: Free Press, 1995.
    [25]Hadjimanolis, A., Dickson, K.. Development of national innovation policy in small developing countries: The case of Cyprus. Research Policy, 2001, 30: 805-817.
    [26]Karo, E., Kattel, R.. Should open innovation change innovation policy thinking in catching-up economies considerations for policy analysis. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2011, 24: 1-2, 173-198.
    [27]Amsden, A. and Chu, W.. Beyond late development: Taiwan's upgrading policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
    [28]Ernst, D.. A new geography of knowledge in the electronics industry? Asia's role in global innovation networks. Policy Studies, Honolulu: East-West Center, 2009, 54: 1-65.
    [29]Ostry, S., Nelson, R.. Techno-nationalism and techno-globalism: Conflict and cooperation. Brookings Institution, WA. 1995.
    [30]Nauwelaers, C., Morgan, K.. The new wave of innovation oriented regional policies: Retrospect and prospects. In: Morgan, K., Nauwelaers, C.(Eds), Regional innovation strategies the challenge for less-favoured regions the stationery office and regional studies association, London, 1999, 224-238.
    [31]Roy, R.. Innovation policies in the U.S. and Japan. Design Studies, 1986, 7(4): 235.
    [32]Blair, R.. Policy tools theory and implementation networks: Understanding state enterprise zone partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2002, 12(2): 161-190.
    [33]Ergas, H.. The importance of technology policy. In: Economic policy and technological performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
    [34]Foray, D., Llerena, P.. Information structure and coordination in technology policy--A theoretical model and two case studies. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1996, 6: 157-173.
    [35]Cantner, U., Pyka, A.. Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective. Research Policy, 2001, 30(5): 759-775.
    [36]Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W.. Government regulations and innovation-industrial innovation and public policy. In: Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W.(Eds), London: Industrial Innovation and Public Policy, 1981.
    [37]Schneider, A., Ingram, H.. Systematically pinching ideas: A comparative approach to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 1988, 8: 61-80.
    [38]Peters, B. G.. Policy instruments and public management: Bridging the gaps. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2000, 10(1): 35-47.
    [39]Freitas, I. M. B., Von Tunzelmann, N.. Mapping public support for innovation: A comparison of policy alignment in the UK and France. Research Policy, 2008, 37: 1446-1464.
    [40]OECD. OECD reviews of innovation policy in China[M]. France: OECD Publishing, 2008.

上一页  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 下一页